[Tagging] Quonset hut

[Warin]

Forest Airport has a hanger that is a very large nissan hut .. at least 
as I understand it. Before 1931.

http://www.forrestairport.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Hercules-off-to-Perth1.jpg

Some history
http://www.forrestairport.com.au/about-us/history/

On 15-Apr-17 12:19 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
> I have a picture of a quonset hut that is still standing out on Adak 
> Island. It was put there during WWII AFAIK. I will try to put it on 
> Wikimedia tomorrow if anybody is interested.
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Rene <ArAge at gmx.co.uk 
> <mailto:ArAge at gmx.co.uk>> wrote:
>
>     First of all, thanks for this discussion guys!
>
>     In addition to Martin I think Wolfgang has the best way to tag a
>     building and what's inside of it. So let's assume you want to tag
>     a very cheap restaurant inside an old Quonset hut the tags will
>     be: amenity=restaurant, building=quonset_hut and
>     food=bad_don't_spend_your_money_here :-)
>
>     One problem though, the key:building wiki needs an extra
>     quonset_hut description and picture for future reference.
>
>     Rene
>
>
>     Op 13-4-2017 om 18:12 schreef Wolfgang Zenker:
>
>         * Michał Brzozowski <www.haxor at gmail.com
>         <mailto:www.haxor at gmail.com>> [170413 16:41]:
>
>             I don't see how going from "typology" you conclude it's
>             strictly about
>             form. Typology is about types, not saying with respect to
>             what.
>             When you look at top building values in Taginfo, it's
>             clear to me
>             these state purpose (house, residential, garage, apartments,
>             industrial, school and so on), with only exception being
>             hut, other
>             non-purpose values from the first page are in fact
>             non-buildings
>             (roof).
>
>         I'm in between here: building typology would depend on the
>         original
>         purpose of the building, but that would not necessary still be the
>         current purpose of the building. So, if a building had originally
>         been constructed as a church and is built in the style of a
>         church,
>         but is now used as a restaurant, it would be tagged
>         amenity=restaurant,
>         building=church.
>
>         Wolfgang
>         (lyx at osm)
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Tagging mailing list
>         Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>         <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>
>
>
>     ---
>     This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>     https://www.avast.com/antivirus <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Dave Swarthout
> Homer, Alaska
> Chiang Mai, Thailand
> Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170415/a42367d2/attachment-0001.html>