[Tagging] Quonset hut

[Rene]

I like to make an extra building key in the key:building wiki but I got 
a few questions:

1. Am I allowed to add such a key?
2. How does it work? I've never done this before so help is very much 
appreciated.
3. Maybe the most important question, which value is it gonna be? 
Quonset_hut, romney_hut or nissen_hut?

Thanks
Rene

Op 15-4-2017 om 7:57 schreef Warin:
> Forest Airport has a hanger that is a very large nissan hut .. at 
> least as I understand it. Before 1931.
>
> http://www.forrestairport.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Hercules-off-to-Perth1.jpg
>
> Some history
> http://www.forrestairport.com.au/about-us/history/
>
> On 15-Apr-17 12:19 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
>> I have a picture of a quonset hut that is still standing out on Adak 
>> Island. It was put there during WWII AFAIK. I will try to put it on 
>> Wikimedia tomorrow if anybody is interested.
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Rene <ArAge at gmx.co.uk 
>> <mailto:ArAge at gmx.co.uk>> wrote:
>>
>>     First of all, thanks for this discussion guys!
>>
>>     In addition to Martin I think Wolfgang has the best way to tag a
>>     building and what's inside of it. So let's assume you want to tag
>>     a very cheap restaurant inside an old Quonset hut the tags will
>>     be: amenity=restaurant, building=quonset_hut and
>>     food=bad_don't_spend_your_money_here :-)
>>
>>     One problem though, the key:building wiki needs an extra
>>     quonset_hut description and picture for future reference.
>>
>>     Rene
>>
>>
>>     Op 13-4-2017 om 18:12 schreef Wolfgang Zenker:
>>
>>         * Michał Brzozowski <www.haxor at gmail.com
>>         <mailto:www.haxor at gmail.com>> [170413 16:41]:
>>
>>             I don't see how going from "typology" you conclude it's
>>             strictly about
>>             form. Typology is about types, not saying with respect to
>>             what.
>>             When you look at top building values in Taginfo, it's
>>             clear to me
>>             these state purpose (house, residential, garage, apartments,
>>             industrial, school and so on), with only exception being
>>             hut, other
>>             non-purpose values from the first page are in fact
>>             non-buildings
>>             (roof).
>>
>>         I'm in between here: building typology would depend on the
>>         original
>>         purpose of the building, but that would not necessary still
>>         be the
>>         current purpose of the building. So, if a building had originally
>>         been constructed as a church and is built in the style of a
>>         church,
>>         but is now used as a restaurant, it would be tagged
>>         amenity=restaurant,
>>         building=church.
>>
>>         Wolfgang
>>         (lyx at osm)
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Tagging mailing list
>>         Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>         <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>>
>>
>>
>>     ---
>>     This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>     https://www.avast.com/antivirus <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Tagging mailing list
>>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Dave Swarthout
>> Homer, Alaska
>> Chiang Mai, Thailand
>> Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170415/929315a1/attachment-0001.html>