[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 3))

[Moritz]

Hi François,
Am 2017-12-20 19:00, schrieb François Lacombe:
> 2017-12-20 12:21 GMT+01:00 Moritz <osm at moritzmueller.ee>:
> 
>> 
>> I disagree, that would make the proposal useless. Then only wrench and
>> check_date would be left.
>> 
> 
> That wasn't my point.
> pump=yes can stay in the proposal

I misunderstood that.
> 
> But pumps tagging is far more complex than values you propose.
> Facts are it's difficult to change established values and I'm not so 
> keen
> on voting them without further thinking.

I agree. But adding the tags like Viking proposed

pump=yes|powered
pump:driven_by=electricity|water.

would not change the any established tags, only add some additional 
keys.

I don't want to open a new proposal process for pumps just for having 
better hydrants tags.
If we would change establiched values it would make sense.

But for now it would only add overhead.

Moritz