[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 3))
Moritz
osm at moritzmueller.ee
Fri Dec 22 10:56:26 UTC 2017
Hi François,
Am 2017-12-20 19:00, schrieb François Lacombe:
> 2017-12-20 12:21 GMT+01:00 Moritz <osm at moritzmueller.ee>:
>
>>
>> I disagree, that would make the proposal useless. Then only wrench and
>> check_date would be left.
>>
>
> That wasn't my point.
> pump=yes can stay in the proposal
I misunderstood that.
>
> But pumps tagging is far more complex than values you propose.
> Facts are it's difficult to change established values and I'm not so
> keen
> on voting them without further thinking.
I agree. But adding the tags like Viking proposed
pump=yes|powered
pump:driven_by=electricity|water.
would not change the any established tags, only add some additional
keys.
I don't want to open a new proposal process for pumps just for having
better hydrants tags.
If we would change establiched values it would make sense.
But for now it would only add overhead.
Moritz
More information about the Tagging
mailing list