[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - CoreIndoor
simon at poole.ch
Mon Feb 20 11:17:03 UTC 2017
Currently nothing breaks when SIT is used and additional ways are added
as a stop gap measure to enable "current" routing engines to work a bit
in such areas (just as it is common to do with pedestrian areas and so
on), and nobody has suggested that such mapping be outlawed (if that was
at all possible in an OSM context).
What however is being requested is that we add a parallel tagging scheme
to SIT based on using ways. That would seem to be turning the clock back
5 years. IndoorOSM, on which SIT is loosely based historically, used
areas for corridors and similar elements and had a working routing
engine that didn't require adding additional ways in 2012. It would seem
silly to spend effort to closely specify something that we want to move
for something that would allow us to move forward, not backward.
Am 19.02.2017 um 12:06 schrieb Richard:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:42:13PM +0100, Tobias Knerr wrote:
>> (2.) Corridors/stairs can use ways
>> This is probably where opinions will vary the most. The decision in favour
>> of area tagging was one of the most fundamental that we made when drafting
>> SIT. Because of this, using highway ways for corridors feels like a big
>> change away from SIT, not merely an extension.
> not really for or against it, but one thing that should be considered is the
> large number of buildings mapped without SIT but with some indoor elements
> and ways mapped using various other methods eg tunnel=buidling_passage,
> highway=corridor, covered etc.
> Those should not be orthogonal to SIT but enhance each other where possible.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Tagging