[Tagging] ref:forward and ref:backward?

[Paul Johnson]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com
> wrote:

>
> 2017-01-12 6:40 GMT+01:00 <roadsguy99 at gmail.com>:
>
>> I certainly use route relations, and since ref is only really used for
>> the renderer, I don’t know what I was thinking ref:forward and ref:backward
>> would be useful for…
>
>
>
> Tagging considerations are not "for the renderer", it's about how the
> world can be abstracted to be stored in such a way that the information you
> are interested in can be found in the data.
>

 At this point, considering most data consumers are aware of route
relations and render against that, and not to knock the carto guys, but is
there any other well known data consumer that's not using relations to
render relations?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170113/033a8729/attachment.html>