[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - dog toilets
dbannon at internode.on.net
Sat Jan 21 10:49:57 UTC 2017
Thanks Joost, I'd prefer option one or four. wrt lack of porcelain, the
term "toilet" can also be used to refer to the room where the porcelain
thing is located. So dog_toilet seems quite accurate.
But dog* or pet* ? I do see people traveling with a cat but would be
very surprised if a cat was comfortable using a doggy smelling place. I
cannot image any other pet being very keen either. So rather than your
99% dog use, I'd suggest its 100% dog for practical purposes. Anyone's
experience different ?
On 20/01/17 19:36, joost schouppe wrote:
> There were some previous discussions on how we could tag designated
> areas for dogs to urinate/defecate. They are quite common, but
> unfortunately there are many different tags going around for lack of
> I have added a section to an old proposal page with these options
> (also links to the previous discussions I know of here). I'm not sure
> how we can get the comments here to translate to reducing the proposal
> to just one tagging option? Maybe have a pre-vote?
> This is an area designated for pets (dogs) urinate and excrete. Unlike
> dog_park label, the main objective of the area is not that dogs play.
> It is usually small and fenced areas, but can also just be a
> designated patch of grass by the side of the road. It is known as
> pee-can in some countries.
> Joost Schouppe
> OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
> Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging