[Tagging] Meaning of cycleway=no

Wiktor Niesiobedzki osm at vink.pl
Thu Jul 20 09:52:47 UTC 2017

2017-07-19 10:37 GMT+02:00 Adam Snape <adam.c.snape at gmail.com>:
> I agree with Wiktor that we shoud use the access tag bicycle=no when
> cycling' is prohibited.
> I agree with Volker that the logical meaning of cycleway=no is that there
> are no cycle tracks or lanes along a section of highway. This might be
> useful information in a similar way to sidewalk=no, not useless like
> building=no  landuse=no.

How does tagging cycleway=no should affect routing or rendering? My
guess it's indistinguishable from having no cycleway tag at all.If
this is used only as a communication between mappers, why then not use
note= tag?



More information about the Tagging mailing list