[Tagging] Meaning of cycleway=no
adam.c.snape at gmail.com
Wed Jul 19 08:37:53 UTC 2017
I agree with Wiktor that we shoud use the access tag bicycle=no when
cycling' is prohibited.
I agree with Volker that the logical meaning of cycleway=no is that there
are no cycle tracks or lanes along a section of highway. This might be
useful information in a similar way to sidewalk=no, not useless like
On 19 Jul 2017 8:43 a.m., "Wiktor Niesiobedzki" <osm at vink.pl> wrote:
> 2017-07-18 23:32 GMT+02:00 marc marc <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com>:
> > Le 18. 07. 17 à 22:55, Wiktor Niesiobedzki a écrit :
> >> Can anybody point me to explanation of this tag value?
> > I would use this tag only whre there is a traffic_sign that forbit
> > cycling where it shoul be allowed without this sign
> Why not "bicycle=no" in such situation?
> >> Should it's use be discouraged by validators / presets?
> >> (at least combinations as highway=cycleway + cycleway=no)
> > It seems to be an error.
> > maybe ask the contributor for the meaning of those tags
> Haven't found recent contribution with cycleway=no. Most of those that
> I investigated where ~3-5 years old.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging