[Tagging] fire hydrants
robert.koch at loggia.at
Thu Jun 15 12:38:06 UTC 2017
On 2017-06-15 01:32, Richard Welty wrote:
> an american usage note:
> the "standard" hydrant in the US has 2 x 2.5" hose connections
> and 1 x 4.5" pumper connection. other sizes have existed in the
Which coupling-type do you use? NST
If so one would describe this hydrant as:
Open: How do we reflect the unit? Millimetres won't work for the US.
> the wrench required for the bolt at the top of a dry hydrant may vary,
> pentagonal bolts are most common but others have been used.
> this is something that a mapper can observe, and something that
> a fireman cares about.
There is not yet a tag for this. In Austria a typical wrench looks like
The left side is used to open the bolt at the top, while the right side
can be used to open the cap of the hose couplings.
> On 6/14/17 6:52 PM, Robert Koch wrote:
>> Hello Alberto,
>> I like your remarks and would like to work together to improve things.
>> On 2017-06-14 19:06, Viking wrote:
>>>> in OsmHydrant  there is already fire_hydrant:coupling_type with various values from Storz to Barcelona
>>>> (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/fire_hydrant:coupling_type). Then there is fire_hydrant:couplings to complement that, describing the > actual connectors: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/fire_hydrant%3Acouplings
>>>> This implementation might not be the best for various reasons, but we could consolidate its structure/values if needed.
>>>>  https://www.osmhydrant.org/en/
>>> It is a bad implementation: first of all because there is no reference on hydrants wiki page (and indeed I didn't know it) and consequentely there is a wide range of heterogeneous values that are almost useless for automatic data search.
>>> By the way, let's try to improve these existing tags.
>>> fire_hydrant:coupling_type indicates the standard (UNI, Storz,...)
>>> fire_hydrant:couplings indicates the number and diameters.
>>> First question: is it possible that the same hydrant has different coupling types, for example Storz and UNI? I know that in Italy, where I work as fireman, this is not possible, so a single value in fire_hydrant:coupling_type is enough.
>> In Austria I've only seen hydrants with one connector type (mostly Storz). S
>>> Second question: how would you indicate the number of couplings? For example an hydrant with two UNI 45 mm couplings and one UNI 70 mm coupling would be:
>>> fire_hydrant:couplings=2 x 45;70
>> So far it was really up to the contributor on OsmHydrant but the
>> recommended way in this case have been so far:
>> Before going on, I've to explain the rationale behind using that scheme
>> first. In Austria we're using character A for 110mm diameter, B for for
>> 75mm and C for either 52 (or 42). In this case it looks easily readable:
>> "1B/2C" or "1A/2B".
>> When it comes to "2x45/1x70" I totally agree that "45;45;70" is much
>> better. Back in time when doing the implementation for OsmHydrant, I
>> didn't know about using the semicolon to split values, but I like it
>> more than the forward slash.
>> Coming back to the Austrian "1A/2B" I would additionally allow using
>> these characters instead of diameter values as well resulting in: "A;B;B"
>> If the proposal is accepted I'd propose migrating all values
>> automatically and changing OsmHydrant. Your scheme with repeating the
>> diameter is much better readable & parse-able by humans & tools.
>> Best regards,
>>> I would prefer 45;45;70 because it's more explicit and less prone to errors.
>>> The use of semicolons to separate different values is commonly accepted on the wiki.
>>> Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Tagging