[Tagging] Combined use of addr:place and addr:street

Javier Sánchez Portero javiersanp at gmail.com
Fri Jun 23 23:49:39 UTC 2017

I edited the wiki and tried to improve the text a bit. As English is not my
native langauge any additional correction will be appreciated.

Best regards.

2017-06-23 10:18 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:

> 2017-06-23 10:01 GMT+02:00 Javier Sánchez Portero <javiersanp at gmail.com>:
>> Regarding to the use of addr:place together with addr:street, I see a
>> discrepancy between [1] which says: "Should not be used together with
>> addr:street=*"
>> And [2], which says: "Use addr:place additional to addr:street=* for such
>> building, whose numbers belong not to street, but to some other object. It
>> is proposed to delete addr:street=* from such houses in the future"
>> I will like to correct this with a unified criterion in both places.
>> Which one is the prefered criterion for you? I think that the addr:place
>> tag should be used when there isn't a street with name to assign to the
>> address so I don't see corret to use addr:street together with addr:place.
>> What is your opinion?
> I agree with you, either use
> addr:place
> or use
> addr:street
> As the reason for using addr:place is that there isn't a street to which
> the address refers, I also don't see which street should go into
> addr:street, it makes no sense.
> Cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170624/d61d350e/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list