[Tagging] Combined use of addr:place and addr:street

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Fri Jun 23 09:18:13 UTC 2017

2017-06-23 10:01 GMT+02:00 Javier Sánchez Portero <javiersanp at gmail.com>:

> Regarding to the use of addr:place together with addr:street, I see a
> discrepancy between [1] which says: "Should not be used together with
> addr:street=*"
> And [2], which says: "Use addr:place additional to addr:street=* for such
> building, whose numbers belong not to street, but to some other object. It
> is proposed to delete addr:street=* from such houses in the future"
> I will like to correct this with a unified criterion in both places. Which
> one is the prefered criterion for you? I think that the addr:place tag
> should be used when there isn't a street with name to assign to the address
> so I don't see corret to use addr:street together with addr:place. What is
> your opinion?

I agree with you, either use

or use

As the reason for using addr:place is that there isn't a street to which
the address refers, I also don't see which street should go into
addr:street, it makes no sense.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170623/f2d018c6/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list