[Tagging] minibus routes

[althio]

+1 to all that, this looks good to me:

type=route
+ route=bus
+ bus=minibus
+ network=*
+ operator=*

-- althio

ps: splitting the discussion about sightseeing/tourist


On 26 June 2017 at 06:39, John Willis <johnw at mac.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 26, 2017, at 1:02 AM, Colin Smale <colin.smale at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>>
>> It sounds to me like it is still a bus route. It may have a different "operator"
>
> +1 the minibus is still a bus.

On 26 June 2017 at 00:06, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 26-Jun-17 02:02 AM, Colin Smale wrote:
>
> On 2017-06-25 16:51, Michael Tsang wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Is there a generally accepted way to tag minibus routes? What I mean is
> that,
> the routes are not part of the standard bus route network, operated with
> fixed
> routing, and use light vehicles (less than 20 passengers).
>
> I am tagging those routes currently with type=route route=minibus, but
> somewhere else in the world the minibus routes are tagged with type=route
> route=bus bus=minibus.
>
> Michael
>
>
> It sounds to me like it is still a bus route. It may have a different
> "operator" and be part of a different "network" and indeed use a different
> type of vehicle, but it is still a subtype of bus so bus=minibus sounds
> appropriate...
>
>
>
> +1
>
> There is no restriction on the size of 'bus'. So I too would use route=bus
> and then if I wanted bus=* to define the type of bus.
> Some routes use several types of bus e.g. bendy, double_decker