[Tagging] Mapping freeway stub ends?

Richard Welty rwelty at averillpark.net
Wed Mar 1 19:34:22 UTC 2017


On 3/1/17 6:54 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> The original example
> https://www.google.com/maps/@40.8190845,-76.8530417,857m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en-US
> <https://www.google.com/maps/@40.8190845,-76.8530417,857m/data=%213m1%211e3?hl=en-US>
> is now a set of ways that can be used as non-freeway highways. I would
> most likely tag them as either service or track with surface and
> tracktype tags. Important to check on the ground the access rights and
> add exact width, surface and smoothness tags.
> In addition I would tag them in addition with
> abandoned:highway=motorway if they were ever used as freeways (which
> seem not to be the case). I would not use the construction tag as this
> would mean that this is part of a freeway under construction.
the disused namespace makes a lot of sense for this kind of in between
circumstance. there are a few things in the Albany NY area that fall in
this category, like the stub ends of the Dunn Bridge which are there, and
have to be maintained because they're part of a heavily used bridge, but
are supposed to connect to a highway that will never be constructed.

https://osm.org/go/ZdrEu0QBY--

note that i just noticed the tagging was less than ideal, and tweaked it,
so the rendering may reflect the older tagging for a little bit.

richard

-- 
rwelty at averillpark.net
 Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
 OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
 Java - Web Applications - Search


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170301/234e9581/attachment.sig>


More information about the Tagging mailing list