[Tagging] Landuse for vacant lots

Dalibor JelĂ­nek dalibor at dalibor.cz
Mon Mar 13 01:24:57 UTC 2017


+1
:-)

 Dalibor

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfgang Zenker [mailto:wolfgang at lyxys.ka.sub.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 1:52 AM
> To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Landuse for vacant lots
> 
> * Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com> [170312 23:51]:
> > On 03/12/2017 04:42 PM, Tristan Anderson wrote:
> >> What is the most appropriate landuse tag for vacant lots in urban areas?
> >>  That is, land that was previously occupied by a house or other
> >> building that has been demolished, no trace of the building remains,
> >> and the land is currently overgrown or covered in untended grass.  In
> >> the past I have used brownfield, but this is for land scheduled for
> >> redevelopment, which is often not the case.
> 
> > Any of landuse=grass, natural=grassland, nautral=scrub, natural=wood
> > depending on just how overgrown it is. Unless someone has a better idea?
> 
> As that land is apparently unused, how about NOT tagging any landuse at all?
> 
> Wolfgang
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




More information about the Tagging mailing list