[Tagging] Landuse for vacant lots
61sundowner at gmail.com
Mon Mar 13 04:01:42 UTC 2017
If you don't know .. then don't tag it.
(grass is not a land use, it is a land cover ... landcover=grass)
On 13-Mar-17 12:24 PM, Dalibor Jelínek wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wolfgang Zenker [mailto:wolfgang at lyxys.ka.sub.org]
>> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 1:52 AM
>> To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Landuse for vacant lots
>> * Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com> [170312 23:51]:
>>> On 03/12/2017 04:42 PM, Tristan Anderson wrote:
>>>> What is the most appropriate landuse tag for vacant lots in urban areas?
>>>> That is, land that was previously occupied by a house or other
>>>> building that has been demolished, no trace of the building remains,
>>>> and the land is currently overgrown or covered in untended grass. In
>>>> the past I have used brownfield, but this is for land scheduled for
>>>> redevelopment, which is often not the case.
>>> Any of landuse=grass, natural=grassland, nautral=scrub, natural=wood
>>> depending on just how overgrown it is. Unless someone has a better idea?
>> As that land is apparently unused, how about NOT tagging any landuse at all?
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Tagging