[Tagging] Landuse for vacant lots

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Mar 13 13:19:47 UTC 2017


2017-03-13 14:09 GMT+01:00 Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com>:

> On 03/13/2017 07:40 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
> >
> > I favor "landuse=disused".
> > That implies that there was previous significant human use, and now
> > there is no real use.
>
> +1
>
> I really like this idea; it fixes the issue of using
> brownfield/greenfield, which imply "slated for future development".
>


+1, I also like the idea. details could be added in disused=...



>
> My suggestion including landuse=grass comes from JOSM presets. Should we
> change these to natural=grass or similar?



I'd prefer landcover=grass if the only notion is "grass"

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170313/73106be5/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list