[Tagging] Landuse for vacant lots

Shawn K. Quinn skquinn at rushpost.com
Mon Mar 13 13:09:07 UTC 2017


On 03/13/2017 07:40 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
> 
> I favor "landuse=disused".
> That implies that there was previous significant human use, and now
> there is no real use.

+1

I really like this idea; it fixes the issue of using
brownfield/greenfield, which imply "slated for future development".

My suggestion including landuse=grass comes from JOSM presets. Should we
change these to natural=grass or similar? I agree that it doesn't belong
in landuse=* unless there's some subtlety about landuse=grass that I'm
missing.

-- 
Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com>
http://www.rantroulette.com
http://www.skqrecordquest.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170313/054340aa/attachment.sig>


More information about the Tagging mailing list