[Tagging] water=pool

[Richard]

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:21:17AM +0000, ael wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:40:24PM +0100, Richard wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 08:24:35PM +1100, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> > when using natural=water + water=pool they would become distinct (though adjacent)
> > water body from the river/creek which they are part of which is not quite right.
> > They are part of the river with special properties.
> > 
> > So perhaps
> >  natural=water + water=river
> >  + stream_pool=yes
> 
> Good point, but why introduce a new term "stream_pool"? Why not just
> pool=yes?

for me pool can mean just too many things, stream_pool isn't even one of
the first ones which I would think of.

Richard