[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Sinkholes refinement

Yuri Astrakhan yuriastrakhan at gmail.com
Sun Nov 12 20:17:45 UTC 2017


David, hi, just an thought - could you combine the rationale and examples
sections?  The way you have it now is first you describe each concept, and
afterwards you have the same concept but with a picture.  I think it would
be better to list each variant with the picture right away.

Thanks!

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:30 AM David Marchal <penegal at live.fr> wrote:

> Hello, there.
>
> Almost 3 weeks passed and only 3 people told that they preferred karst=yes
> instead of karstic=yes. As the first one was also the one stated as the
> proposal, and the second one was only mentioned in erroneous examples, I
> assume this relative unanimity is enough to confirm karst=yes as the one to
> use, and will create the wiki page accordingly. Thanks to all who voted;
> the proposal process is now fully finished, apart from creating all the
> Wiki pages.
>
> Regards.
>
>
> Le 24 oct. 2017 à 19:16, David Marchal <penegal at live.fr> a écrit :
>
> Hello, there.
>
> The vote period passed, and the proposal received a total of 16 approvals,
> 1 spoilt vote and 0 refusals, so I closed the vote and marked the proposal
> as approved. Thanks to all the voters; I’ll create the according Wiki pages
> and edit existing ones to reflect the vote on the following days.
>
> As a side note, there is a secondary vote on the proposal page; indeed,
> some voters noticed an inconsistency in the proposal, ie. a proposal
> example carried karstic=yes tagging instead of the proposed karst=yes. To
> make sure of what version the voters approved, I have to ask them to go
> back on the proposal page and vote, in the dedicated subsection, amongst
> karstic=yes or karst=yes. Once the choice will have been asserted, I’ll be
> able to create the corresponding Wiki page.
>
> Thanking you for your patience, and awaiting your votes,
>
> Regards.
>
> Le 8 oct. 2017 à 09:51, David Marchal <penegal at live.fr> a écrit :
>
> Hello, there.
>
> The normal voting duration passed, but there are not enough votes yet to
> approve or reject the proposal, so I extend the voting period by two weeks
> to allow latecomers to vote.
>
> Awaiting your votes,
>
> Reagrds.
>
> Le 26 sept. 2017 à 20:26, David Marchal <penegal at live.fr> a écrit :
>
> Hello, there.
>
> As this proposal has been RFCed more than 2 weeks ago, and that comments
> have been addressed, I’m now putting it on vote. Please go on the proposal
> page (
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Sinkholes_refinement)
> to vote.
>
> Awaiting your votes,
>
> Regards.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20171112/b53e0458/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list