[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Sinkholes refinement

Yuri Astrakhan yuriastrakhan at gmail.com
Tue Nov 14 19:31:29 UTC 2017


Hi David,  you do have a point. Perhaps it should be altered after the
voting? Unless if no one has voted yet one way or the other? Awaiting other
opinions.

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:34 PM, David Marchal <penegal at live.fr> wrote:

> Hi, Yuri.
>
> Though I understand your request and find it relevant, I’m unsure about
> altering a proposal page after the vote had started; AFAIK, I’m supposed to
> let it as is, apart from the vote section. Could you show me if my
> assumption is wrong, or can someone on the ML confirm or infirm that?
>
> Awaiting your answers,
>
> Regards.
>
> Le 12 nov. 2017 à 21:17, Yuri Astrakhan <yuriastrakhan at gmail.com> a écrit
> :
>
> David, hi, just an thought - could you combine the rationale and examples
> sections?  The way you have it now is first you describe each concept, and
> afterwards you have the same concept but with a picture.  I think it would
> be better to list each variant with the picture right away.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:30 AM David Marchal <penegal at live.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hello, there.
>>
>> Almost 3 weeks passed and only 3 people told that they preferred
>> karst=yes instead of karstic=yes. As the first one was also the one stated
>> as the proposal, and the second one was only mentioned in erroneous
>> examples, I assume this relative unanimity is enough to confirm karst=yes
>> as the one to use, and will create the wiki page accordingly. Thanks to all
>> who voted; the proposal process is now fully finished, apart from creating
>> all the Wiki pages.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>> Le 24 oct. 2017 à 19:16, David Marchal <penegal at live.fr> a écrit :
>>
>> Hello, there.
>>
>> The vote period passed, and the proposal received a total of 16
>> approvals, 1 spoilt vote and 0 refusals, so I closed the vote and marked
>> the proposal as approved. Thanks to all the voters; I’ll create the
>> according Wiki pages and edit existing ones to reflect the vote on the
>> following days.
>>
>> As a side note, there is a secondary vote on the proposal page; indeed,
>> some voters noticed an inconsistency in the proposal, ie. a proposal
>> example carried karstic=yes tagging instead of the proposed karst=yes. To
>> make sure of what version the voters approved, I have to ask them to go
>> back on the proposal page and vote, in the dedicated subsection, amongst
>> karstic=yes or karst=yes. Once the choice will have been asserted, I’ll be
>> able to create the corresponding Wiki page.
>>
>> Thanking you for your patience, and awaiting your votes,
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Le 8 oct. 2017 à 09:51, David Marchal <penegal at live.fr> a écrit :
>>
>> Hello, there.
>>
>> The normal voting duration passed, but there are not enough votes yet to
>> approve or reject the proposal, so I extend the voting period by two weeks
>> to allow latecomers to vote.
>>
>> Awaiting your votes,
>>
>> Reagrds.
>>
>> Le 26 sept. 2017 à 20:26, David Marchal <penegal at live.fr> a écrit :
>>
>> Hello, there.
>>
>> As this proposal has been RFCed more than 2 weeks ago, and that comments
>> have been addressed, I’m now putting it on vote. Please go on the proposal
>> page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Sinkh
>> oles_refinement) to vote.
>>
>> Awaiting your votes,
>>
>> Regards.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20171114/c239392c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list