[Tagging] Proposed deletion of wiki pages about motorcycle_friendly=*

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

2017-10-02 13:21 GMT+02:00 Michael Reichert <osm-ml at michreichert.de>:

>
>
> What are your opinions?




I agree that features which have been rejected in proposal voting should
not get a feature definition page, at least not if they are disputed and
not used in significant numbers (there will still be the proposal page to
document them). If used in significant numbers but still disputed (and
rejected), they should get a bold hint on top, ideally with reference to
related discussion.

Significant amendments, changes and removals to/from feature definition
pages after voting should at least be discussed beforehand (when
documenting common practise) and/or should be voted on as well.

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20171002/23a374b1/attachment.html>