[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v2 Vehicle Type "coach"

Mikolai-Alexander Gütschow mikolai.guetschow at t-online.de
Sat Oct 7 03:07:47 UTC 2017


Ok, what do you think about the following options then:

  * route:scope with local (urban?), regional, national
    (long_distance?), international
  * public_transport:stops with non_stop, limited and many (applies
    mostly to buses and trains)
  * public_transport:service with train_replacement, post, share_taxi,
    on_demand, school, tourism (for buses); high_speed, car, car_shuttle
    (for trains); other possible options for other route service types
  * public_transport:time with night, peak

I thought of public_transport instead of route because the latter three 
only apply to public transport routes, whereas scope could be used as 
replacement for the (different use of the) network tag on cycle and 
hiking routes.

Cheers!


------------------------------------------------------------------------
El 06/10/17 a las 01:51, Martin Koppenhoefer escribió:
> what I forgot to conclude: as the values are mostly new, and it’s not an access restriction, I’d use a different key for this, rather than bus you could use something like route:scope or route:type etc.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 6. Oct 2017, at 02:12, Mikolai-Alexander Gütschow <mikolai.guetschow at t-online.de> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Martin for your answers, please refer to the Talkpage for my answers
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20171006/c5c7f94f/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list