[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

[Michael Reichert]

Hi,

Am 2017-10-14 um 00:29 schrieb Jo:
> 2017-10-13 23:59 GMT+02:00 Andrew Davidson <theswavu at gmail.com>:
> We don't have a scheme to tag the timetables and it would be quite hard to
> come up with one, involving many relations we don't want to maintain.
> Better to leave that part to GTFS.
> 
> So the proposal is about the routes/itineraries that change, stops that
> aren't served anymore or new stops added to the lines. Not about the bus
> passing by 10 minutes earlier at 8 am on Wednesdays.
> 
> That's the way I understand it, anyway.

That's my intention.

I think that timetable details (departure times) should not be mapped in
OSM due to the reasons given by Jo.

Best regards

Michael


-- 
Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten
ausgenommen)
I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20171014/f99690aa/attachment.sig>