[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

Andrew Davidson theswavu at gmail.com
Sat Oct 14 08:30:58 UTC 2017



On 14/10/17 18:53, Michael Reichert wrote:
> 
> If recheck_itinerary_route_by=<date> reduces the confusion (see email by
> Andrew) and nobody opposes on this mailing list (or a parallel
> discussion), I will change the proposed tag. 

It does make it much clearer that the tag is intended for the data 
maintainer. I'd still belt-and-brace it with source and source:date tags 
as you are relying on other mappers not messing up you tags and you 
might reduce the chance of all your tags disappearing.



More information about the Tagging mailing list