[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations
Andrew Davidson
theswavu at gmail.com
Sat Oct 14 08:30:58 UTC 2017
On 14/10/17 18:53, Michael Reichert wrote:
>
> If recheck_itinerary_route_by=<date> reduces the confusion (see email by
> Andrew) and nobody opposes on this mailing list (or a parallel
> discussion), I will change the proposed tag.
It does make it much clearer that the tag is intended for the data
maintainer. I'd still belt-and-brace it with source and source:date tags
as you are relying on other mappers not messing up you tags and you
might reduce the chance of all your tags disappearing.
More information about the Tagging
mailing list