[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

[Michael Reichert]

Hi,

Am 2017-10-14 um 06:49 schrieb Jo:
> Maybe
> 
> recheck_itinerary_route_by
> 
> would be a better tag. Then it can also be used when route relations are
> changed for roadworks that take more than say, a month and that cause
> changes in itinerary.

If recheck_itinerary_route_by=<date> reduces the confusion (see email by
Andrew) and nobody opposes on this mailing list (or a parallel
discussion), I will change the proposed tag. In addition, this tag will
hopefully discourage mappers from adding a start_date equivalent
although it was not proposed (An end implies a start, doesn't it?).

Best regards

Michael

-- 
Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten
ausgenommen)
I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20171014/afb8576a/attachment.sig>