[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Rivers Classification

[Kevin Kenny]

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> (Yes I can hear the 'tagging for the render' cry from here already. However
> this looks to be usefull information that mappers want to tag.
> So give them a way of doing it and let the mappers and renders chose to use
> it or not.)

This is a case where the 'tagging for the renderer' cry is misplaced.
It's impossible to base a rendering decision on something that isn't
represented by any tag.

'Tagging for the renderer' is telling a lie
to make something look good, not entering a fact into the
database so that some rendering can make use of it.