[Tagging] Swimming pool facilities
Selfish Seahorse
selfishseahorse at gmail.com
Tue Sep 26 17:40:11 UTC 2017
On 26 September 2017 at 16:52, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com> wrote:
> There's ample reason for mapping private swimming pools, so I
> take issue with "makes no sense at all". How else are you going to
> indicate to fire fighters that there is a swimming pool on the premises
> (both as a hazard and as a source of water)?
>
> There's absolutely nothing wrong with 'leisure=swimming_pool
> access=private',
> and I've surely tagged a few dozen of them.
OK, that makes sense. I didn't think of that. (Although I'd have
preferred landuse=basin for such cases, keeping leisure=swimming_pool
for public swimming pools.)
However, I'd be interested in your opinion on leisure=swimming_facility.
More information about the Tagging
mailing list