[Tagging] Missing access value (access=license / authorization?)

[Szem]

I would just ask that this proposal process is absolutely necessary? (I 
don't want to bypass it simply I don't know)

2018.08.02. 21:25 keltezéssel, Marc Gemis írta:
> Kevin,
>
> Just to prepare you a bit: it's very well possible that you will get
> objections very late in the approval process. eg. during the voting
> phase from people that never discussed the tag before. We've seen this
> e.g. with amenity/tourism=reception(_desk), where people just ignored
> all previous discussion on the mailing list and the discussion page.
>
> I wish you good luck with your proposal though.
>
> m.
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 8:11 PM Kevin Kenny<kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Is there a documented process for putting a proposal? I'm certainly willing to draft the text, although I'm not going to be able to do it before the weekend. Can someone else run the proposal process or at least guide me through it?
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018, 12:55 PM Szem<szembiketeam at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> A couple of us have said their opinion.
>>> It seems to me nobody have said the access=permit tag is useless.
>>> And now, what is the next step? Worldwide the 97% of editors have not read this mailing list. Without written a short explanation in the wiki only a few editor will use it, or they will use a lot of other form.
>>>
>>> (There would be no greater agreement if we would analyze e.g. access=permessive tag…)
>>>
>>>   Szem
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging