[Tagging] Lane geometry in OSM

djakk djakk djakk.djakk at gmail.com
Fri Aug 3 14:30:56 UTC 2018


I think it is less verbose.

There can be multiple ways to express something in osm, like in the Ruby
language ?


djakk


Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 16:21, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> a écrit :

> while this might work, why would you try to replace an established
> tagging system ?
> The tagging system turn:lanes:xxx is  supported by several data
> consumers (OsmAnd, maps.me, MagicEarth and probably others).
> In many countries people worked on tagging all roads with this system
> after a project set up by the German community.
>
> m.
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 4:10 PM djakk djakk <djakk.djakk at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello !
> >
> > What about a tagging method like this :
> >
> > lanes=3
> > lane_2=forward_direction;left_turn
> >
> >  or
> >
> > lanes=3
> > lane_2:direction=forward
> > lane_2:turn=left
> >
> >  instead of
> >
> > lanes=3
> > lanes:forward=2
> > turn:lanes:forward=left|through
> >
> >  ?
> >
> >
> > djakk
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 13:13, Lionel Giard <lionel.giard at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> >>
> >> If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging (
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a suggested
> way of tagging (in "Examples/Motorways") is using letter to indicate which
> lane goes to where (when there is a transition). This could be used to
> extent the width tagging for transition lane (where one lane split to two
> (or conversely). There are already a lot of possibility to tag detailed
> lanes, but we could indeed add the width in it !
> >>
> >> PS: sorry for the previous message, i miss-clicked.
> >>
> >> 2018-08-03 13:08 GMT+02:00 Lionel Giard <lionel.giard at gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging (
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a suggested
> w
> >>>
> >>> 2018-08-02 23:56 GMT+02:00 Tom Hardy <rhardy702 at gmail.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>> I've experimented a bit with lane and road attributes as in
> >>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505256201 and the adjoining
> intersection.
> >>>> No width, but number, function and placement of lanes.  For
> placement, I
> >>>> always selected the center of the throughway.  This allows renderers
> that pay
> >>>> no attention to lane attributes to render a straight line through an
> >>>> intersection.
> >>>>
> >>>> JOSM's "Enhanced lane and road attributes" visualizer shows this
> quite well.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Tom Hardy <rhardy702 at gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Tagging mailing list
> >>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Tagging mailing list
> >> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180803/c56cdd25/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list