[Tagging] Fwd: Missing access value (access=license / authorization?)
kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com
Sun Aug 12 20:50:00 UTC 2018
Oops, posted from wrong return address...
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Missing access value (access=license / authorization?)
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 9:48 AM Szem <szembiketeam at gmail.com> wrote:
> I begun to use the "permit" tag, what is the correct tagging for these categories?
> - Roads found in Waterworks area (You could get permit only for biking and walking, no cars except for their own ones)
> access=private, motor_vehicle / vehicle = private ? bicycle=permit, foot=permit, horse=no
Sounds right; no need to tag motor_vehicle separately, since 'access'
covers all transportation modes that aren't called out separately.
> - Roads on the embankments (By any motor vehicle without permission is forbidden, except for their own ones, other access is free)
> access= private, motor_vehicle / vehicle =permit ? foot=yes, horse=yes, bicycle=yes,
If permission is readily obtainable, then 'permit'. If permission
happens on a case-by-case basis, 'private' is probably closer.
> - Roads managed by Hunting Association, wildlife conservation areas (Crossing by any vehicle without permission is forbidden, except for their own ones):
> access= private, motor_vehicle / vehicle = permit, foot=yes, horse=permit, bicycle= permit
Once again, if it's "access granted if you comply with the
formalities", then 'permit', otherwise 'private'. The Hunting
Association one sounds as if it restricts access to its own members?
In that case, it's definitely "private."
More information about the Tagging