[Tagging] Fwd: Missing access value (access=license / authorization?)

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sun Aug 12 21:36:06 UTC 2018

sent from a phone

> On 12. Aug 2018, at 23:30, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> In cases when only official vehicles (National Parks, Water supply etc) are allowed, I've always called that vehicles=no, working on " no – No access for the general public."?

If there are people who can access, you should prefer “private” over no.

IMHO we should remove “for the general public” in the above definition. Where did you find this sentence?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180812/e56889a6/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list