[Tagging] Fwd: Missing access value (access=license / authorization?)
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Aug 13 15:05:56 UTC 2018
sent from a phone
> On 13. Aug 2018, at 14:35, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:
> All I was attempting here was to point out that access=no is different from
> access=private and can have valid uses. It's not crazy to have both. It may be rare to have access=no, but any time
> you see a sign "No vehicles beyond this point" it applies.
actually that is vehicle=no
Still I agree with the rest of what you wrote, there is a distinction of private and no, at least conceptually (not so sure about actual tagging), and no would expectly be much fewer than anything else.
More information about the Tagging