[Tagging] Fwd: Missing access value (access=license / authorization?)

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Aug 13 15:05:56 UTC 2018

sent from a phone

> On 13. Aug 2018, at 14:35, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:
> All I was attempting here was to point out that access=no is different from
> access=private and can have valid uses.   It's not crazy to have both.  It may be rare to have access=no, but any time
> you see a sign "No vehicles beyond this point" it applies. 

actually that is vehicle=no

Still I agree with the rest of what you wrote, there is a distinction of private and no, at least conceptually (not so sure about actual tagging), and no would expectly be much fewer than anything else.


More information about the Tagging mailing list