[Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?
winfixit at gmail.com
Thu Aug 16 22:06:47 UTC 2018
you mean it must be tagged:
designated is an odd word. I started to understand it as signposted as
such, or clear from road markings.
but it's not the meaning it has in designated driver, where it means
"assigned with a specific role/responsability"
Op do 16 aug. 2018 om 23:59 schreef Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com>:
> On 17/08/18 07:46, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > sent from a phone
> >> On 16. Aug 2018, at 23:35, seirra <general at sarifria.x10.bz> wrote:
> >> should cases where yes was used be corrected to designated? or should
> it be considered a stylistic choice?
> > generally, it doesn’t work very well, because you want to express who
> can park there not who can access the lot. It should be “only” or
> “designated” because yes does not exclude others, while only does and
> designated tends to do.
> For OSM .. to exclude others it should it not be tagged
> disabled=yes/designated to accept disabled?
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging