[Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

[Jo]

you mean it must be tagged:

access=no
+exceptions
?

designated is an odd word. I started to understand it as signposted as
such, or clear from road markings.

but it's not the meaning it has in designated driver, where it means
"assigned with a specific role/responsability"

Op do 16 aug. 2018 om 23:59 schreef Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com>:

> On 17/08/18 07:46, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >
> > sent from a phone
> >
> >> On 16. Aug 2018, at 23:35, seirra <general at sarifria.x10.bz> wrote:
> >>
> >> should cases where yes was used be corrected to designated? or should
> it be considered a stylistic choice?
> >
> > generally, it doesn’t work very well, because you want to express who
> can park there not who can access the lot. It should be “only” or
> “designated” because yes does not exclude others, while only does and
> designated tends to do.
> >
>
> For OSM .. to exclude others it should it not be tagged
>
> access=no
>
> then
>
> disabled=yes/designated to accept disabled?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180817/2ff64732/attachment.html>