[Tagging] areas of risk

[djakk djakk]

For such a subjective thing, it should be mapped by each openstreetmap
member : djakk maps this area as dangerous, baloo as not dangerous, etc
 and the renderer makes an average.


djakk



Le sam. 18 août 2018 à 06:26, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> a écrit :

>
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 16:17 Adam Franco <adamfranco at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Another "risk" case would be an area where a civil war or conflict has
>> divided who controls what land. Either side of the line of control may be
>> incredibly risky for people affiliated with the other side but not to the
>> supporters of those in control.
>>
>
> At least this is objectively reportable and we have tagging for this as a
> result:  Disputed territory is mapped as part of each party state as well
> as disputed=yes on the lines actually under dispute as a basic minimum.
> Though this doesn't tell you if the dispute is, say, a low-simmering
> situation on the level of party states playing professional capture the
> flag (Denmark by way of Greenland vs Canada on Hans Island in the Kennedy
> Strait) or a multilateral bloody humanitarian crisis like Kashmir.
>
>> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180818/22dcc36e/attachment-0001.html>