[Tagging] Stolpersteine tagging scheme problem

Peter Elderson pelderson at gmail.com
Sat Aug 25 17:38:56 UTC 2018


Done some more reading. Stolpersteine are not just metal plaques on some brick, they are actually stones placed in the pavement. A Stolperstein is an object in its own right. I think memorial=Stolperstein is fitting. With capital and all.

Mvg Peter Elderson

> Op 25 aug. 2018 om 19:05 heeft Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> 
> 
> sent from a phone
> 
>> On 25. Aug 2018, at 15:46, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> [lutz]
>>> Thanks. He has already responded in this thread as the one who has chosen historic=memorial + memorial=plaque + plaque=stolperstein (as opposed to 4 others who prefer historic=memorial + memorial=stolperstein):
>> 
>> 
>> Since lutz is the main driving force behind heritage=* and historic=* and related tagging, his opinion is informed. 
> 
> 
> there is no definition for the plaque tag and I am not able to deduct a system by looking at the values:
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/plaque#values
> 
> Most used value is “metal” which would fit for a stolperstein as it is quite unspecific. (no plaque=stolperstein yet). metal=stolperstein??? Would mean we would have to add 4 tags for a stolperstein, as opposed to the current alternatives each with 2 tags:
> historic=memorial 
> memorial=plaque 
> plaque=metal 
> metal=stolperstein 
> 
> -1
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Martin 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180825/36e4eb75/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list