[Tagging] Stolpersteine tagging scheme problem
Peter Elderson
pelderson at gmail.com
Sat Aug 25 17:38:56 UTC 2018
Done some more reading. Stolpersteine are not just metal plaques on some brick, they are actually stones placed in the pavement. A Stolperstein is an object in its own right. I think memorial=Stolperstein is fitting. With capital and all.
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 25 aug. 2018 om 19:05 heeft Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 25. Aug 2018, at 15:46, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [lutz]
>>> Thanks. He has already responded in this thread as the one who has chosen historic=memorial + memorial=plaque + plaque=stolperstein (as opposed to 4 others who prefer historic=memorial + memorial=stolperstein):
>>
>>
>> Since lutz is the main driving force behind heritage=* and historic=* and related tagging, his opinion is informed.
>
>
> there is no definition for the plaque tag and I am not able to deduct a system by looking at the values:
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/plaque#values
>
> Most used value is “metal” which would fit for a stolperstein as it is quite unspecific. (no plaque=stolperstein yet). metal=stolperstein??? Would mean we would have to add 4 tags for a stolperstein, as opposed to the current alternatives each with 2 tags:
> historic=memorial
> memorial=plaque
> plaque=metal
> metal=stolperstein
>
> -1
>
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180825/36e4eb75/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list