[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Mapping disputed boundaries (Version 1.2)

Johnparis okosm at johnfreed.com
Mon Dec 3 09:19:42 UTC 2018

FYI, I have just added a few possible renderings:



On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 6:23 PM Johnparis <okosm at johnfreed.com> wrote:

> I have just posted an extensively revised version of my proposal on
> mapping disputed boundaries. Thanks for everyone who gave public and
> private feedback.
> I've archived some of the comments that are no longer applicable, and of
> course I expect lots of new comments!
> There are several examples, including a few possible rendering ideas,
> along with a transition plan and a new Criterion 1 for the List of Claiming
> Entities. If the proposal is adopted, I plan to open a discussion about the
> criteria for the list.
> I have also created a scratch pad page for ideas for extensions. I am a
> little surprised not to see a discussion about using land boundaries (I
> discovered there is already an approved tag for these) vs. maritime
> boundaries. If people want to discuss the merits, I'm open -- and I'm also
> open to using maritime boundaries, as we do now in the default rendering.
> The proposal is here:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mapping_disputed_boundaries
> John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181203/a9d31c8b/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list