[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Mapping disputed boundaries (Version 1.2)

Johnparis okosm at johnfreed.com
Tue Dec 4 00:10:35 UTC 2018


I have done some slight tweaking/reorganizing of the proposal page, mostly
to separate out the rendering (which is not part of the proposal) from the
tagging (which is).

John

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:19 AM Johnparis <okosm at johnfreed.com> wrote:

> FYI, I have just added a few possible renderings:
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mapping_disputed_boundaries/renderings
>
> John
>
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 6:23 PM Johnparis <okosm at johnfreed.com> wrote:
>
>> I have just posted an extensively revised version of my proposal on
>> mapping disputed boundaries. Thanks for everyone who gave public and
>> private feedback.
>>
>> I've archived some of the comments that are no longer applicable, and of
>> course I expect lots of new comments!
>>
>> There are several examples, including a few possible rendering ideas,
>> along with a transition plan and a new Criterion 1 for the List of Claiming
>> Entities. If the proposal is adopted, I plan to open a discussion about the
>> criteria for the list.
>>
>> I have also created a scratch pad page for ideas for extensions. I am a
>> little surprised not to see a discussion about using land boundaries (I
>> discovered there is already an approved tag for these) vs. maritime
>> boundaries. If people want to discuss the merits, I'm open -- and I'm also
>> open to using maritime boundaries, as we do now in the default rendering.
>>
>> The proposal is here:
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mapping_disputed_boundaries
>>
>> John
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181204/17e17f46/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list