[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Mapping disputed boundaries (Version 1.2)
okosm at johnfreed.com
Tue Dec 4 00:10:35 UTC 2018
I have done some slight tweaking/reorganizing of the proposal page, mostly
to separate out the rendering (which is not part of the proposal) from the
tagging (which is).
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:19 AM Johnparis <okosm at johnfreed.com> wrote:
> FYI, I have just added a few possible renderings:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 6:23 PM Johnparis <okosm at johnfreed.com> wrote:
>> I have just posted an extensively revised version of my proposal on
>> mapping disputed boundaries. Thanks for everyone who gave public and
>> private feedback.
>> I've archived some of the comments that are no longer applicable, and of
>> course I expect lots of new comments!
>> There are several examples, including a few possible rendering ideas,
>> along with a transition plan and a new Criterion 1 for the List of Claiming
>> Entities. If the proposal is adopted, I plan to open a discussion about the
>> criteria for the list.
>> I have also created a scratch pad page for ideas for extensions. I am a
>> little surprised not to see a discussion about using land boundaries (I
>> discovered there is already an approved tag for these) vs. maritime
>> boundaries. If people want to discuss the merits, I'm open -- and I'm also
>> open to using maritime boundaries, as we do now in the default rendering.
>> The proposal is here:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging