[Tagging] Suggestion: ref:mobile_payment for amenity=parking

Michael Brandtner brandtner_michael at yahoo.de
Wed Dec 5 12:33:51 UTC 2018


 I'm not sure how to proceed now. Should I create a proposal for this?
    Am Samstag, 1. Dezember 2018, 12:16:42 MEZ hat bkil <bkil.hu+Aq at gmail.com> Folgendes geschrieben:  
 
 You have the choice to disagree with micromapping and ignore it. Many such decisions are made on a local level, for example when executing mapping parties.
We help define such keys in a consistent manner so *others* may map such micro features. We are not encouraging others to do micromapping either, but if they do, they will at least not sprinkle the database with random, inconsistent keys. Though certain imports provide such information as well, making mapping effort a non-issue.
Based on such precisely defined keys, you have all means to filter the database when you load them onto your devices or your services, so it should not cause harm to data consumers either.
Also note that one's trash is another's treasure. While neither you nor I would map railroad ties, some would consider localizing balise useful, and with a proper reader (or an import) it is just a matter of going along the track (or even riding the train).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balise
If you are orienteering or simply lost, reference numbers on balise, power poles or other man made objects could come in handy for those without electronics and having only a printed OpenStreetMap.
A more realistic example is that to you, wifi or power supplies may not be important, but if one doesn't have mobile Internet subscription and a large powerback or if the given provider in the given village has appalling coverage, it can come useful to know which pub to favor when on a long trip (or during a mapping party). Same goes for marking pub sports - you may not be playing these, but not everyone attends pubs for the sole purpose of getting wasted.
I don't like to judge the needs of others, as I may not know all local circumstances, and anyway - who am I to judge? If something can in general be considered important for a large class of people, I usually map it regardless whether I need it or whether I endorse the practice.
Going back to the question of parking, it has occurred to me a lot that drivers asked where they can found the nearest meter. In many cases, they could have purchased their tickets via SMS, but they didn't know the code and couldn't find the meter to find such tiny piece of information. If even a single minute is wasted per driver for finding a meter and walking up to it just for reading the code, we're wasting a large amount of GDP for something where we could offer a better solution with ease. Again, this doesn't bother me much as I'm usually parking for free, but I map such things for solidarity.

Take care and be nice to others,k

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 9:46 PM Sergio Manzi <smz at smz.it> wrote:

  
+1 You're my hero!
 
To clarify: my contribution was about making right (according to my point of view, of course!) something that I thought had issues, but in a general way I'm totally with you and I'm finding a little bit crazy the level of details that someone want to use in the description of OSM features, some of which, I think, should have very little to do with OSM (I'm thinking of the  meticoulous description/mapping of infrastructures of less than general interest. As I said elswere: should we map railroad ties too?).
 
 
Thanks!
 
Sergio
 

 
 On 2018-11-29 21:29, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
  
 
 
  On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 02:19, Sergio Manzi <smz at smz.it> wrote:
  
  
Right! Too many payments! :-) To spare some bytes it could be: payment:sms:ExampleApp:code=<code to send>.  What do you think?
  
 I would think that it shouldn't be up to OSM to list all the ways someone can pay for parking, down to which app to use or phone number to call / SMS. 
  OSM should say that "this" area is paid parking & leave it at that - once the driver parks their car, they walk over to the payment terminal & all the necessary info is listed there, & updated as needed by the car park operator - their problem, not our's! 
  Thanks 
  Graeme      
  _______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
 
 _______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181205/c4f63275/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list