[Tagging] Can OSM become a geospacial database?

Eugene Podshivalov yaugenka at gmail.com
Thu Dec 6 09:25:40 UTC 2018


Let me clarify the meaning of those Russian words
"пруд" - is usually a natural but modified by a man body of water which is
smaller than lake. this is usually translated as "pond"
"копанка" - is a very small body of water, escavated by an individual
family for private fishing, usually of a square shape about 10x20 meters in
size.

Making additional subcategories makes sense only when they are commonly
recognized.
Adding language sepecific tag would work better here in my mind:
water=pond + water:ru=копанка
this way we preserve the generic categorization and let it be expanded for
local purpose.

With regards to "озеро" (lake) it is even more complecated. In Russian we
may call "озеро" both natural and man-modified bodies of water.
So both water=lake and water=pond can be called "озеро".
The afore-mentioned solution could solve it:
water=lake + water:ru=озеро
water=pond + water:ru=озеро

Another solution as suggested in the original post is to introduce some
generic (category independent) tag like "name:prefix/postfix" or
"type:<lang>" etc. for such things.

чт, 6 дек. 2018 г. в 04:17, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com>:
> For example, in America we can call a waterway=stream a “brook”, “creek”,
> “run” and several other things. These waterways will be tagged
> waterway=stream or =river (depending on size) with name=“Bull Run”,
> =“Walker Creek”, =“Johnson’s Brook”, etc.
> We don’t use waterway=creek or waterway=run because there is no consistent
> difference between these. In fact in Standard British English a Creek is
> often a tidal channel in a salt marsh or mangroves.

If you put “brook”, “creek”, “run” etc. in the name field you will
get tautology in search results like: "stream Blue creek". So either all
objects should have their category in the name field and the search engine
will not add anything or no objects should have category in the name fields
and the search engine will take the category from some other field and
append it to name.
E.g. assume you have name=Blue + waterway=stream + waterway:en=creek, you
search for "Blue" and get "Blue creek".

чт, 6 дек. 2018 г. в 10:26, Johnparis <okosm at johnfreed.com>:

> Thanks, Michal. Following that link led me to:
>
> shop=butcher + butcher=pork
>
> which specifically mentions charcuterie. Presumably covers this too.
>
> Best,
>
> John
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:18 AM Michal Fabík <michal.fabik at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 10:03 PM Sergio Manzi <smz at smz.it> wrote:
>> > I have the same problem for some shop categories which are not part of
>> the US/UK tradition: an Italian "salumeria" [1] is in no way similar to a
>> US "deli" shop...
>>
>> Hi, the wiki specifically mentions this and suggests a different way
>> of tagging American delis:
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Ddeli
>>
>> --
>> Michal Fabík
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181206/1a6b0580/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list