[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Top up

Tobias Knerr osm at tobias-knerr.de
Thu Dec 27 12:35:36 UTC 2018

On 26.12.2018 19:05, bkil wrote:> top_up:phone:‹brand›=yes;no
> top_up:transport:‹brand›=yes;no
> top_up:credit_card:‹brand›=yes;no
> This is not the same wording as discussed above, but I still like this one.

I'd prefer if the supported brands were part of the value – as most
brand-related strings currently are. Like this, for example:

top_up:phone = Brand1;Brand2

Otherwise, we would end up with a very large, unbounded number of keys,
which likely isn't as easy to support for editing tools. And (although
this is the least important reason) brands are likely to use characters
such as uppercase letters or non-ASCII characters that should be avoided
in keys where possible.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181227/be673c96/attachment.sig>

More information about the Tagging mailing list