[Tagging] Proposed features - RFC 2 - Pressurized waterways

[Richard]

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 03:26:07PM +0100, François Lacombe wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> 2018-02-12 17:12 GMT+01:00 Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com>:
> 
> > Does that help or make matters worse?
> >
> 
> Thank you for your contribution.
> 
> Given problem is cluttering waterway=* key a bit more with additional
> values may not be accepted.
> According to comments, I should use established values and the only one
> added is waterway=pressurised.

why not pipeline for this?? And pressurised should be an attribute to
canal and/or pipeline, not a separate value.

Richard