[Tagging] Proposed features - RFC 2 - Pressurized waterways
ricoz.osm at gmail.com
Tue Feb 13 22:09:16 UTC 2018
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 03:26:07PM +0100, François Lacombe wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 2018-02-12 17:12 GMT+01:00 Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com>:
> > Does that help or make matters worse?
> Thank you for your contribution.
> Given problem is cluttering waterway=* key a bit more with additional
> values may not be accepted.
> According to comments, I should use established values and the only one
> added is waterway=pressurised.
why not pipeline for this?? And pressurised should be an attribute to
canal and/or pipeline, not a separate value.
More information about the Tagging