[Tagging] tagging for decaying features
Kevin Kenny
kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com
Thu Jan 4 02:52:21 UTC 2018
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 9:27 PM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> In which case I like marc tagging solution;
>
> building=school
> building:use=residential
>
> That tags 'what is on the ground'.
>
To me, it seems to presuppose an unrealistic amount of cleverness
on the part of the renderer, particularly since 'building:use' is not
a common key at all.
By contrast, adding 'historic' and adjusting tagging to current use
is already a common practice among those who fix repurposed
features from the GNIS import. I didn't invent it.
'disused', 'abandoned', 'demolished', 'ruined', are all preferable
to 'historic' if they're accurate. Sometimes none of them fits.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180103/6db67312/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list