[Tagging] tagging religion-based access & on-topic
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Thu Jul 5 13:21:50 UTC 2018
access:muslim=yes would need to be combined with access=no,what would be problematic - if anybody is processing access info it would end
marking temples as forbidden.
And yes, trolling in form of mocking anybody should not be present
on OSM mailing lists.
5. Lipiec 2018 13:24 od rory at technomancy.org <mailto:rory at technomancy.org>:
> I think access:*=yes/no is the most friendly to data consumers since a
> consumer can just look at all keys starting with "access:" and go from
> there. This could be useful for less frequent access tags.
> And I think we can have a tagging discussion without mocking all
> religions (not all of which believe in an afterlife BTW).
> On 04/07/18 22:29, Paul Allen wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:16 PM, Jmapb <>> jmapb at gmx.com <mailto:jmapb at gmx.com>>> <>> mailto:jmapb at gmx.com <mailto:mailto:jmapb at gmx.com>>> >> wrote:
>> I'd suggest something like access=customers, but that comes off as
>> cheeky when you're talking about religion.
>> Seems OK to me. They're selling after-life insurance. Pay your tithe or put money on the collection plate and you
>> go to heaven. And there's a money-back guarantee: if you don't go to heaven, or there's no afterlife at all, simply
>> return and make a complaint and they'll give you your money back. They've never had to pay up under that
>> guarantee in the thousands of years they've been operating. That shows how good they are.
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging