[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - ephemeral -STOPPED

[Warin]

On 18/07/18 16:27, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On 18/07/18 13:02, Warin wrote:
>> Voting stopped due to removal of section.
>
> That was my bad. I'd been confused when I found three voting sections 
> on the page. From your email I had been expecting to vote twice, but 
> when I found three sections and noticed that you had only voted twice 
> I had assumed that the third vote was a cut-and-paste error.
>
> I apologise, I should have read the third section much, much more 
> closely before deleting.

I should have made it clear.

>
> Having said that the third vote is a little redundant. The second vote 
> is "Optional voting on a default of intermittent=yes for the key 
> ephemeral" and the third vote is "Optional voting on requesting 
> mappers to add intermittent=yes to the key ephemeral". The only 
> internally logical votes are yes for two and no for three (or 
> vice-versa). If you vote yes/yes then you are saying the default for 
> intermittent is yes but you still have to add it. If you vote no/no 
> then you are saying the default value for intermittent is no but you 
> don't have to add it for ephemeral=*.

The last 2 votes are meant to be yes for one only,  as I said .. I 
should have made that clear.
There is no compulsion to vote for the last 2, it is just 2 different 
ways of doing the same thing.
So voting yes for one of the two will do the job.

I'll try a table and see how that looks .. the options side by side 
might be a visual hint.

---------------------------------
It will give me a chance to respond to some of the votes already cast .. 
which I'll take the full opportunity to do so :)
So in a way it is a good thing.