[Tagging] building=clubhouse

[Warin]

On 19/07/18 13:52, Marc Gemis wrote:
> for the complete "base" of the club, the club page [1] recommends "The 
> base of the club can be tagged amenity=community_centre with the type 
> community_centre=club_home and possibly the target group 
> community_centre:for=*; either on the containing building or the same 
> element as the club itself."

It also says some thing about the grounds too ... so it may not be 
'just' the building.
Arr here it is "Draw an area area 
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area>for the campus of the 
community centre, comprising buildings and outdoor areas."
link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre

So a golf course would have this tag around the entire ground .. not 
just the building. And that would be a duplication of leisure=golf_course.

I don't think that fits with golf courses .. and probably some other 
clubhouses. So that recommendation is not valid for golf at least.

And for tagging the club=* yes .. I would do that on a node not the 
building.. if necessary.
But I think anything I could place under the club tag I could also put 
under the building tag?
link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:club


The subject is building = clubhouse ... ?

> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:club On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 
> at 5:16 AM Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi, With the golfing thing that I have on another thread there is the 
>> tagging of golf=clubhouse suggested on a building=yes. That is 
>> specific to golf, what about other clubhouses? Taginfo has uses of 
>> 557 building=clubhouse 479 golf=clubhouse 121 tennis:clubhouse=* 98 
>> amenity=clubhouse 9 building=Clubhouse 6 designation=Clubhouse That 
>> is some 1,200 uses. Not vast by any means .. but if a combined tag 
>> were created with good documentation and links then I'd thing the 
>> numbers would take off .. there are a lot of football clubs with club 
>> houses around me ... umm what are tagged as they now? building=yes by 
>> the look of things. Would it not be best to combine all theses into 
>> building=clubhouse? Any associated sport could be specified with 
>> sport=*. A description could be - "A building that supports a club by 
>> providing a social area, amenities and/or specific facilities to 
>> support the clubs activities." I note that this was raised on the 
>> proposal of building .. but not taken up as 'pavilion' was pursued in 
>> its place. See 
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/building 
>> Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Tagging 
>> mailing list Tagging at openstreetmap.org 
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging 
> _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list 
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180719/97796212/attachment-0001.html>