[Tagging] Missing access value (access=license / authorization?)
daveswarthout at gmail.com
Fri Jul 27 15:38:20 UTC 2018
Here we go again.
I have used access=permit in several instances. I'm clear on what it means
and the differences between the various access tags. I'm using the tag and
unless someone shows me a good reason why such tagging is proven incorrect
in some way, I'll continue to use it.
I'm betting this thread will end up like the others, mired in differing
opinions with no consensus possible.
Mateusz wrote: "Tagging mailing list is not a decision making
comiite [sic]. It is a place to get a feedback."
There you go. I agree fully. You are never going to find consensus on this
list so go ahead and use the tags.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 1:02 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> sent from a phone
> On 26. Jul 2018, at 19:39, Szem <szembiketeam at gmail.com> wrote:
> - Roads on the embankments (The longest ones in category. Driving by car
> without permission is forbidden, other access is free. Some roads on the
> embankments are free access):
> The access tags are: access= private, foot=yes, horse=yes, motor_vehicle /
> vehicle? =private, bicycle=yes, *motorcar=license, motorcycle=license*
> if other access is free and restrictions only apply to motorcars (or
> more likely motor vehicles), you should not put access=private, and you
> will not need *=yes (it’s the default), you can put motor_vehicle=private
> (or permit if this makes more sense), and be done. More concise, clearer
> and more correct (because with access=private you exclude everybody you did
> not even know about)
> Also from my understanding, if someone can access the way under whatever
> condition the value can never be “no”.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging