61sundowner at gmail.com
Fri Jun 8 23:51:12 UTC 2018
On 09/06/18 09:37, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On 8 June 2018 at 21:01, <osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au
> <mailto:osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au>> wrote:
> I agree that the 5 different values shown on the wiki describe
> distinctly different things and should all be retained.
> *From:*Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com
> <mailto:andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>>
> *Sent:* Friday, 8 June 2018 20:41
> *To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> <tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:tagging at openstreetmap.org>>
> *Subject:* Re: [Tagging] Lifeguards
> I strongly disagree that they are the same, they are used to map
> different things
> Thanks, everyone, that's fine - keep it as 5 separate definitions,
> but, I would think, all rendered the same ie life ring?
> For my own benefit though - lifeguard=place
> Do those poor sod's take their chairs down the beach & sit, extremely
> uncomfortably, behind a woefully inadequate windbreak :-) /in the same
> spot/ every day?
At Bondi and other places they have a permanent building ... arr here it is
"source:geometry"="NSW LPI Imagery"
> Our lifeguards do sit in their 4wd cars on the beach every day, but
> they can position themselves anywhere over a several 00 m stretch,
> depending on beach & surf conditions, & where the safest swimming spot
> is that day, so they couldn't be mapped as a lifeguard=place.
Obviously not .. too mobile. Do they have a 'club house'? I'd map that.
It would be a place to go and get help if you could not see anything else.
> "should be rendered" -> do you mean on the default OpenStreetMap
> style? Did you want to open a ticket on the stylesheet issue
> I thought that that was what I was doing, but obviously not? To (mis-)
> quote Oddball "I don't know how it works, I just use it"! :-)
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging