[Tagging] Access=no for bus lanes

Neil Matthews ndmatthews at plus.net
Sat Jun 9 09:13:31 UTC 2018

I quite often find "access=no", replaced by "motor_vehicle=no" by
armchair editors -- I think they want to make sure that horses can use
the bus lanes?


On 08/06/2018 13:18, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2018-06-08 10:44 GMT+02:00 Fran├žois Lacombe <fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com
> <mailto:fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com>>:
>     it's written that dedicated bus lanes should get access=no and I
>     find this too restrictive.
>     Such lanes can also be accessible by cabs, bikes or by foot.
>     It's sounds to be a mean to prevent cars only to take those lanes
>     actually
> for bus _lanes_ access=no will typically make sense, for bus _roads_
> (i.e. only busses allowed on the road, but there might be other
> non-lanes included in the highway, like sidewalks) I have sometimes
> found this applied by error, because mappers forgot about the pedestrians.
> Cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180609/31d2fd7b/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list