[Tagging] The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Wed Jun 13 08:56:08 UTC 2018


On 13/06/18 18:46, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2018-06-13 9:44 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com 
> <mailto:marc.gemis at gmail.com>>:
>
>
>     * trees in gardens or in a meadow or any other area whose primary
>     function is not "trees" ( (using overlapping landuse ?)
>
>
>
> can you please rephrase this? It is not clear what you are asking.

There is large area that are used by the military here. Some of that 
area is coved in trees.
Way: Holsworthy Military Reserve (374783780)
   Tags:
     "landuse"="military"
     "name"="Holsworthy Military Reserve"
     "access"="private"
Relation: 1542927
   Tags:
     "natural"="wood"
     "type"="multipolygon"

The wood multipolygon has inners to exclude areas that are not trees.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180613/0a3930e1/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list