[Tagging] The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Jun 13 09:36:31 UTC 2018
13. Jun 2018 10:34 by dieterdreist at gmail.com <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
> 2018-06-13 9:20 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoniecz at tutanota.com <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>> >:
>>> A forest is a place where you can walk, ride, cycle. Not someones
>>> private backyard.
>> So you want to count tree-covered areas that are not private? (including ones in private backyards).
> the question of ownership and the orthogonal question of accessibility should not be mixed with the question whether an area is a forest or not. Different properties (at least for me), and depending on culture and jurisdiction.
Obviously - ownership would be recorded in owner tag (rarely done for obvious reasons) and
access in access tag (very rarely done for objects like forests, including forests with restricted entry).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging